Plymouth Argyle v Ipswich
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Plymouth Argyle lost to Ipswich 0–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Conor Chaplin for 1+ shots total (85%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Marcus Harness for 1+ fouls committed (83%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conor Chaplin | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kieffer Moore | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 5 | ✓ |
| Marcus Harness | fouls committed | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jeremy Sarmiento | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 0 | ✗ |
| Lewis Travis | fouls committed | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kieffer Moore | fouls committed | 1+ | 81% | 4 | ✓ |
| Morgan Whittaker | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ryan Hardie | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sam Morsy | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Omari Hutchinson | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jeremy Sarmiento | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Omari Hutchinson | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 6 | ✓ |
| Matthew Sorinola | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Marcus Harness | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 59% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 58% | No | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 42% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Ipswich 3–2 Plymouth Argyle Oct 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Plymouth Argyle v Ipswich?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Plymouth Argyle v Ipswich?
The most confident call it got wrong was Marcus Harness at 83% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.