Queens Park Rangers v Huddersfield Town
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Queens Park Rangers drew with Huddersfield Town 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Paul Smyth for 1+ fouls drawn (82%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Lyndon Dykes for 1+ shots total (80%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Smyth | fouls drawn | 1+ | 82% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ilias Chair | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sinclair Armstrong | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lyndon Dykes | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jack Colback | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
| Rhys Healey | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 4 | ✓ |
| Alex Matos | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 4 | ✓ |
| Bojan Radulović | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Rhys Healey | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Alex Matos | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Paul Smyth | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Paul Smyth | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Rhys Healey | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jonathan Hogg | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Shots total · Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 37% | 7 cards | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 35% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 27% | 2 goals | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards · BTTS
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Huddersfield Town 2–1 Queens Park Rangers Oct 2023
- Huddersfield Town 1–1 Queens Park Rangers Feb 2023
- Queens Park Rangers 1–2 Huddersfield Town Nov 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Queens Park Rangers v Huddersfield Town?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Queens Park Rangers v Huddersfield Town?
The most confident call it got wrong was Lyndon Dykes at 80% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.