Wigan Athletic v Bristol City
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Wigan Athletic drew with Bristol City 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Tommy Conway for 1+ shots total (84%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Chris Martin for 1+ shots total (83%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Conway | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 3 | ✓ |
| Andreas Weimann | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Chris Martin | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alex Scott | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 0 | ✗ |
| Josh Magennis | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
| James McClean | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tom Naylor | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Will Keane | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Joe Williams | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jay DaSilva | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mark Sykes | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Joe Williams | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 3 | ✓ |
| Callum Lang | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 4 | ✓ |
| Alex Scott | fouls drawn | 1+ | 70% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 20% | 3 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Bristol City 1–1 Wigan Athletic Feb 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Wigan Athletic v Bristol City?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Wigan Athletic v Bristol City?
The most confident call it got wrong was Chris Martin at 83% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.