Fulham v Wolves
How the SharpXI model rated this Premier League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Fulham beat Wolves 3–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Harry Wilson for 1+ shots total (94%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Raúl Jiménez for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raúl Jiménez | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Harry Wilson | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 5 | ✓ |
| João Gomes | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kenny Tete | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ryan Sessegnon | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Santiago Bueno | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jean-Ricner Bellegarde | fouls drawn | 1+ | 90% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jhon Arias | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kevin | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tolu Arokodare | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| João Gomes | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ryan Sessegnon | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Hugo Bueno | tackles | 1+ | 84% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 49% | No | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 44% | 3 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 27% | 5 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Wolves 1–1 Fulham May 2026
- Wolves 1–2 Fulham Feb 2025
- Fulham 1–4 Wolves Nov 2024
- Wolves 2–1 Fulham Mar 2024
- Fulham 3–2 Wolves Nov 2023
- Fulham 1–1 Wolves Feb 2023
- Wolves 0–0 Fulham Aug 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Fulham v Wolves?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Fulham v Wolves?
The most confident call it got wrong was Raúl Jiménez at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Premier League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.