Falkirk FC v Hibernian
How the SharpXI model rated this Scottish Premiership fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Falkirk FC lost to Hibernian 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Barney Stewart for 1+ shots total (94%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Ben Parkinson for 1+ shots total (89%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barney Stewart | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kyrell Wilson | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Calvin Miller | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 3 | ✓ |
| Martin Boyle | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ben Parkinson | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Owen Elding | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 0 | ✗ |
| Josh Campbell | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ben Broggio | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ethan Ross | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 1 | ✓ |
| Dylan Tait | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Joe Newell | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 1 | ✓ |
| Finn Yeats | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 0 | ✗ |
| Henry Cartwright | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
| Brad Spencer | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Falkirk FC 4–1 Hibernian Jan 2026
- Hibernian 3–0 Falkirk FC Dec 2025
- Falkirk FC 2–2 Hibernian Sep 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Falkirk FC v Hibernian?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Falkirk FC v Hibernian?
The most confident call it got wrong was Ben Parkinson at 89% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Scottish Premiership?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.