Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell usUpdated daily. Tell us
SharpXI©
Championship 25/26

Bristol City v Queens Park Rangers

How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

Bristol City1 – 2 Queens Park Rangers 4 Oct 2025
10/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Bristol City lost to Queens Park Rangers 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Scott Twine for 1+ shots total (94%, had 1). Its clearest miss: George Tanner for 1+ tackles (89%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Edward Duckworth refereed this match

8 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record

See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip ›

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Scott Twine shots total 1+ 94% 1 ✓
Jimmy Dunne tackles 1+ 91% 3 ✓
Anis Mehmeti shots total 1+ 90% 1 ✓
Richard Kone shots total 1+ 90% 3 ✓
Emil Riis Jacobsen shots total 1+ 89% 1 ✓
George Tanner tackles 1+ 89% 0 ✗
Rumarn Burrell shots total 1+ 87% 1 ✓
Ross McCrorie tackles 1+ 86% 1 ✓
Scott Twine fouls drawn 1+ 86% 0 ✗
Paul Smyth fouls drawn 1+ 86% 0 ✗
Koki Saito tackles 1+ 86% 1 ✓
Jonathan Varane tackles 1+ 86% 1 ✓
Ross McCrorie fouls committed 1+ 83% 0 ✗
Karamoko Dembélé shots total 1+ 83% 1 ✓

How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn Fouls committed

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 49% Yes ✓
Match goals O2.5 42% 3 goals ✓
Match cards O4.5 27% 6 cards ✓

How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Bristol City v Queens Park Rangers?

10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Bristol City v Queens Park Rangers?

The most confident call it got wrong was George Tanner at 89% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.