Huddersfield Town v West Brom
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Huddersfield Town lost to West Brom 1–4, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Josh Koroma for 1+ shots total (79%, had 1). Its clearest miss: David Kasumu for 1+ fouls committed (78%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Koroma | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| David Kasumu | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Andreas Weimann | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Grady Diangana | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 2 | ✓ |
| Daniel Ward | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Delano Burgzorg | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jack Rudoni | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jonathan Hogg | fouls committed | 1+ | 68% | 3 | ✓ |
| David Kasumu | fouls drawn | 1+ | 68% | 1 | ✓ |
| Grady Diangana | shots total | 1+ | 68% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mikey Johnston | shots total | 1+ | 68% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jack Rudoni | fouls committed | 1+ | 68% | 1 | ✓ |
| Adam Reach | shots total | 1+ | 68% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tom Fellows | fouls drawn | 1+ | 66% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 42% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 35% | 5 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 18% | 2 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- West Brom 1–2 Huddersfield Town Sep 2023
- West Brom 1–0 Huddersfield Town Mar 2023
- Huddersfield Town 2–2 West Brom Aug 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Huddersfield Town v West Brom?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Huddersfield Town v West Brom?
The most confident call it got wrong was David Kasumu at 78% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.