Middlesbrough v Oxford United
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Middlesbrough drew with Oxford United 0–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Jack Currie for 1+ tackles (95%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Will Vaulks for 1+ tackles (86%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Currie | tackles | 1+ | 95% | 3 | ✓ |
| Morgan Whittaker | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 6 | ✓ |
| Hayden Hackney | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Riley McGree | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| David Strelec | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tommy Conway | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Will Vaulks | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jamie McDonnell | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 7 | ✓ |
| Jeremy Sarmiento | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Aidomo Emakhu | fouls drawn | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Aidan Morris | fouls drawn | 1+ | 86% | 4 | ✓ |
| Jamie Donley | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Aidan Morris | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Will Lankshear | fouls committed | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Tackles Shots total Fouls drawn Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 49% | No | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 47% | 0 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 29% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Oxford United 1–1 Middlesbrough Nov 2025
- Middlesbrough 2–1 Oxford United Mar 2025
- Oxford United 2–6 Middlesbrough Nov 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Middlesbrough v Oxford United?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Middlesbrough v Oxford United?
The most confident call it got wrong was Will Vaulks at 86% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.