Preston North End v Reading
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Preston North End beat Reading 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 13 landed — the strongest being Thomas Cannon for 1+ shots total (90%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Cesare Casadei for 1+ shots total (76%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Cannon | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 4 | ✓ |
| Andy Carroll | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ben Whiteman | tackles | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Troy Parrott | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Brad Potts | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Joshua Onomah | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Lucas João | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 1 | ✓ |
| Daniel Johnson | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Álvaro Carreras | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 3 | ✓ |
| Troy Parrott | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 4 | ✓ |
| Andy Yiadom | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Andy Yiadom | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Cesare Casadei | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Cesare Casadei | tackles | 1+ | 75% | 3 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 30% | 4 cards | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 13% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 13% | 3 goals | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards BTTS
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Reading 1–2 Preston North End Nov 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Preston North End v Reading?
13 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Preston North End v Reading?
The most confident call it got wrong was Cesare Casadei at 76% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.