Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Queens Park Rangers beat Rotherham United 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 14 landed — the strongest being Tom Eaves for 1+ fouls committed (87%, had 2). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Eaves | fouls committed | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Paul Smyth | fouls drawn | 1+ | 82% | 4 | ✓ |
| Michael Frey | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ilias Chair | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
| Andy Rinomhota | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Chris Willock | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 5 | ✓ |
| Sam Nombe | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Paul Smyth | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tom Eaves | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 4 | ✓ |
| Jack Colback | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 3 | ✓ |
| Andy Rinomhota | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sam Nombe | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Joe Hodge | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 1 | ✓ |
| Chris Willock | fouls drawn | 1+ | 69% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Fouls drawn · Shots total
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 36% | 5 cards | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 33% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 28% | 3 goals | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards · BTTS
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Rotherham United 1–1 Queens Park Rangers Nov 2023
- Rotherham United 3–1 Queens Park Rangers Mar 2023
- Queens Park Rangers 1–1 Rotherham United Aug 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United?
14 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United?
Every one of its confident calls landed this time — a single strong game, not a verdict. When the model does miss, those rows sit in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross; we never hide them.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.