Stoke City v Leeds
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Stoke City lost to Leeds 0–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 13 landed — the strongest being Daniel James for 1+ shots total (94%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Lynden Gooch for 1+ tackles (95%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynden Gooch | tackles | 1+ | 95% | 0 | ✗ |
| Daniel James | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Joël Piroe | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 4 | ✓ |
| Lewis Koumas | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Brenden Aaronson | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 5 | ✓ |
| Eric Bocat | tackles | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Wouter Burger | tackles | 1+ | 89% | 5 | ✓ |
| Manor Solomon | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jayden Bogle | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Andrew Moran | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 4 | ✓ |
| Souleymane Sidibe | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ben Wilmot | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Sam Byram | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ethan Ampadu | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Tackles Shots total
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 60% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 54% | No | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 48% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Leeds 6–0 Stoke City Apr 2025
- Leeds 1–0 Stoke City Mar 2024
- Stoke City 1–0 Leeds Oct 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Stoke City v Leeds?
13 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Stoke City v Leeds?
The most confident call it got wrong was Lynden Gooch at 95% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.