Stoke City v Luton
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Stoke City drew with Luton 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Sam Gallagher for 1+ fouls committed (86%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Ali Al-Hamadi for 1+ fouls committed (75%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Gallagher | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tahith Chong | fouls drawn | 1+ | 82% | 1 | ✓ |
| Carlton Morris | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 4 | ✓ |
| Million Manhoef | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Thelo Aasgaard | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 4 | ✓ |
| Ali Al-Hamadi | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Wouter Burger | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 4 | ✓ |
| Sam Gallagher | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ben Pearson | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Millenic Alli | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 5 | ✓ |
| Isaiah Jones | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jun-Ho Bae | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ali Al-Hamadi | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Isaiah Jones | fouls drawn | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Fouls drawn · Shots total
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 52% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 48% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 30% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Luton 2–1 Stoke City Dec 2024
- Luton 1–0 Stoke City Feb 2023
- Stoke City 2–0 Luton Nov 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Stoke City v Luton?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Stoke City v Luton?
The most confident call it got wrong was Ali Al-Hamadi at 75% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.