Watford v Sunderland
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Watford beat Sunderland 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Romaine Mundle for 1+ fouls committed (81%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Tom Ince for 1+ fouls committed (78%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romaine Mundle | fouls committed | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Romaine Mundle | fouls drawn | 1+ | 81% | 4 | ✓ |
| Festy Ebosele | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jobe Bellingham | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tom Ince | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Wilson Isidor | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ryan Porteous | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
| Patrick Roberts | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
| Daniel Jebbison | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Vakoun Issouf Bayo | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Edo Kayembe | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Festy Ebosele | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Moussa Sissoko | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Romaine Mundle | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Fouls drawn · Shots total
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 54% | 3 cards | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 52% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 47% | 3 goals | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards · BTTS
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Sunderland 2–2 Watford Feb 2025
- Watford 1–0 Sunderland Apr 2024
- Sunderland 2–0 Watford Oct 2023
- Sunderland 2–2 Watford Apr 2023
- Watford 2–2 Sunderland Sep 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Watford v Sunderland?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Watford v Sunderland?
The most confident call it got wrong was Tom Ince at 78% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.