Leicester v Nottingham Forest
How the SharpXI model rated this Premier League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Leicester lost to Nottingham Forest 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 14 landed — the strongest being Chris Wood for 1+ shots total (94%, had 3). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdul Fatawu Issahaku | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Chris Wood | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jordan Ayew | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ryan Yates | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Nicolás Domínguez | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ryan Yates | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Callum Hudson Odoi | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Stephy Mavididi | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Facundo Buonanotte | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 4 | ✓ |
| Jamie Vardy | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Anthony Elanga | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Elliot Anderson | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 5 | ✓ |
| Facundo Buonanotte | tackles | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Nicolás Domínguez | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Tackles Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 55% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 51% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 30% | 8 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Nottingham Forest 2–2 Leicester May 2025
- Nottingham Forest 2–0 Leicester Jan 2023
- Leicester 4–0 Nottingham Forest Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Leicester v Nottingham Forest?
14 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Leicester v Nottingham Forest?
Every one of its confident calls landed this time — a single strong game, not a verdict. When the model does miss, those rows sit in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross; we never hide them.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Premier League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.