Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
Championship · 25/26

Birmingham City v Coventry City

How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

Birmingham City3 – 2 Coventry City 4 Jan 2026
12/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Birmingham City beat Coventry City 3–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Ellis Simms for 1+ shots total (84%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Jay Stansfield for 1+ fouls committed (73%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
James Linington refereed this match 4.09cards/game 1.02×vs league 82games
James Linington's card record →
See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Ellis Simms shots total 1+ 84% 5
Lewis Koumas fouls committed 1+ 82% 1
Ephron Mason-Clark fouls drawn 1+ 82% 2
Haji Wright shots total 1+ 82% 1
Ephron Mason-Clark fouls committed 1+ 82% 2
Josh Eccles fouls drawn 1+ 81% 1
Jay Stansfield shots total 1+ 78% 2
Tatsuhiro Sakamoto fouls drawn 1+ 74% 4
Jack Rudoni shots total 1+ 74% 1
Ephron Mason-Clark shots total 1+ 74% 3
Jay Stansfield fouls committed 1+ 73% 0
Patrick Roberts shots total 1+ 73% 0
Marvin Ducksch shots total 1+ 72% 3
Josh Eccles shots total 1+ 72% 2

How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 57% Yes
Match goals O2.5 53% 5 goals
Match cards O4.5 40% 5 cards

How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Birmingham City v Coventry City?

12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Birmingham City v Coventry City?

The most confident call it got wrong was Jay Stansfield at 73% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.