Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
Championship · 24/25

Hull City v Burnley

How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

Hull City1 – 1 Burnley 23 Oct 2024
11/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Hull City drew with Burnley 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Hannibal Mejbri for 1+ fouls drawn (82%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Lewie Coyle for 1+ fouls drawn (79%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Dean Whitestone refereed this match 3.41cards/game 0.85×vs league 87games
Dean Whitestone's card record →
See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Hannibal Mejbri fouls drawn 1+ 82% 1
Luca Koleosho fouls committed 1+ 81% 2
Lewie Coyle fouls drawn 1+ 79% 0
Josh Laurent fouls committed 1+ 78% 1
Zian Flemming fouls committed 1+ 78% 2
Hannibal Mejbri fouls committed 1+ 77% 5
Zian Flemming shots total 1+ 76% 4
Josh Brownhill fouls committed 1+ 76% 1
Chris Bedia fouls committed 1+ 76% 0
Jaidon Anthony shots total 1+ 76% 2
João Pedro Galvão fouls committed 1+ 73% 1
Abu Kamara fouls committed 1+ 72% 1
Connor Roberts fouls drawn 1+ 71% 0
Mohamed Belloumi shots total 1+ 70% 2

How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Fouls committed · Shots total

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 36% Yes
Match cards O4.5 32% 1 cards
Match goals O2.5 29% 2 goals

How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Hull City v Burnley?

11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Hull City v Burnley?

The most confident call it got wrong was Lewie Coyle at 79% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.