Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
Championship · 25/26

Hull City v Stoke City

How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

Hull City0 – 1 Stoke City 1 Jan 2026
12/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Hull City lost to Stoke City 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Róbert Boženík for 1+ fouls committed (86%, had 3). Its clearest miss: David Akintola for 1+ shots total (75%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Craig Pawson refereed this match

10 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record →

See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Róbert Boženík fouls committed 1+ 86% 3
Matt Crooks fouls committed 1+ 83% 2
Róbert Boženík shots total 1+ 79% 3
Lamine Cissé fouls committed 1+ 79% 1
Sam Gallagher fouls committed 1+ 76% 2
Kyle Joseph fouls committed 1+ 75% 3
David Akintola shots total 1+ 75% 0
Oli McBurnie fouls committed 1+ 75% 1
Oli McBurnie shots total 1+ 75% 2
Lamine Cissé shots total 1+ 74% 2
Liam Millar shots total 1+ 73% 2
David Akintola fouls committed 1+ 73% 0
Darko Gyabi fouls drawn 1+ 72% 1
Joel Ndala shots total 1+ 71% 1

How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 53% No
Match goals O2.5 50% 1 goals
Match cards O4.5 48% 5 cards

How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Hull City v Stoke City?

12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Hull City v Stoke City?

The most confident call it got wrong was David Akintola at 75% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.