Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
Championship · 24/25

Preston North End v Plymouth Argyle

How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

Preston North End1 – 2 Plymouth Argyle 26 Apr 2025
9/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Preston North End lost to Plymouth Argyle 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Ryan Hardie for 1+ shots total (84%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Ryan Ledson for 1+ fouls committed (84%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Matt Donohue refereed this match 4.37cards/game 1.09×vs league 107games
Matt Donohue's card record →
See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Ryan Ledson fouls committed 1+ 84% 0
Ryan Hardie shots total 1+ 84% 1
Darko Gyabi fouls drawn 1+ 80% 0
Emil Riis Jacobsen shots total 1+ 79% 4
Robbie Brady fouls committed 1+ 78% 3
Callum Wright fouls committed 1+ 78% 1
Milutin Osmajić shots total 1+ 77% 2
Mustapha Bundu fouls committed 1+ 76% 1
Muhamed Tijani fouls committed 1+ 75% 4
Muhamed Tijani shots total 1+ 74% 0
Darko Gyabi fouls committed 1+ 74% 0
Kaine Kesler-Hayden fouls drawn 1+ 74% 1
Muhamed Tijani fouls drawn 1+ 71% 1
Callum Wright fouls drawn 1+ 70% 0

How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 48% Yes
Match goals O2.5 48% 3 goals
Match cards O4.5 34% 5 cards

How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Preston North End v Plymouth Argyle?

9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Preston North End v Plymouth Argyle?

The most confident call it got wrong was Ryan Ledson at 84% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.