Queens Park Rangers v Leeds
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Queens Park Rangers drew with Leeds 2–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Michael Frey for 1+ fouls committed (84%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Daniel James for 1+ shots total (84%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel James | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 0 | ✗ |
| Michael Frey | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 4 | ✓ |
| Wilfried Gnonto | fouls drawn | 1+ | 83% | 3 | ✓ |
| Wilfried Gnonto | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Joël Piroe | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jack Colback | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Paul Smyth | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Koki Saito | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Paul Smyth | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Brenden Aaronson | fouls drawn | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Manor Solomon | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Junior Firpo | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 3 | ✓ |
| Brenden Aaronson | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Koki Saito | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 3 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 37% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 36% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 35% | 6 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Leeds 2–0 Queens Park Rangers Nov 2024
- Queens Park Rangers 4–0 Leeds Apr 2024
- Leeds 1–0 Queens Park Rangers Oct 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Queens Park Rangers v Leeds?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Queens Park Rangers v Leeds?
The most confident call it got wrong was Daniel James at 84% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.