Rotherham United v Hull City
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Rotherham United lost to Hull City 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 13 landed — the strongest being Jaden Philogene-Bidace for 1+ shots total (95%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Ozan Tufan for 1+ shots total (88%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaden Philogene-Bidace | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 5 | ✓ |
| Billy Sharp | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 1 | ✓ |
| Noah Ohio | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ozan Tufan | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jaden Philogene-Bidace | fouls drawn | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sam Clucas | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Christ Junior Tiehi | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Peter Kioso | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Oliver Rathbone | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Anass Zaroury | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 4 | ✓ |
| Fabio Carvalho | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 3 | ✓ |
| Sam Nombe | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Charlie Wyke | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jaden Philogene-Bidace | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Tackles
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 33% | 3 cards | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 30% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 27% | 3 goals | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards BTTS
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Hull City 4–1 Rotherham United Nov 2023
- Hull City 0–0 Rotherham United Apr 2023
- Rotherham United 2–4 Hull City Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Rotherham United v Hull City?
13 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Rotherham United v Hull City?
The most confident call it got wrong was Ozan Tufan at 88% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.