Southampton v Sheffield Wednesday
How the SharpXI model rated this Championship fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Southampton beat Sheffield Wednesday 3–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Leo Scienza for 1+ fouls drawn (84%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Flynn Downes for 1+ fouls committed (80%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leo Scienza | fouls drawn | 1+ | 84% | 5 | ✓ |
| Svante Ingelsson | fouls committed | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
| Adam Armstrong | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 4 | ✓ |
| Flynn Downes | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Bailey Cadamarteri | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jamal Lowe | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 5 | ✓ |
| Finn Azaz | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 5 | ✓ |
| Jay Robinson | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tom Fellows | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Bailey Cadamarteri | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 5 | ✓ |
| Jay Robinson | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Charlie McNeill | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Leo Scienza | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ike Ugbo | shots total | 1+ | 70% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Fouls committed · Shots total
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 69% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 64% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 49% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Sheffield Wednesday 1–3 Southampton Feb 2026
- Southampton 4–0 Sheffield Wednesday Jan 2024
- Sheffield Wednesday 1–2 Southampton Aug 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Southampton v Sheffield Wednesday?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Southampton v Sheffield Wednesday?
The most confident call it got wrong was Flynn Downes at 80% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Championship?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.