Adam Reach
Wing-back 50% of 16 recent starts Lincoln CityChampionship 26/27
What a window counts
Hit rates count the most recent completed games, newest first — reaching back into earlier seasons when the current one is short, and into games for a previous club, including in another league we cover.
All markets last 10 games
Compared with a Championship wing-back, 25/26, 718 appearances
Five selections from the player report, free in your inbox
Picked from 41 selections across 14 matches on this week’s slate, each with its record and the market price.
Confirmed by a link. Unsubscribe in one click. Or open the player report.
In 26/27, Adam Reach has hit 1+ shot on target in 12% of 8 Championship appearances (1 of 8), 1+ total shot in 75%, 1+ foul committed in 38%, 1+ foul won in 50%, and been booked in 0% (0 of 8). These are raw hit rates from completed matches, not odds.
Comparable wing-backs
The closest 5 profiles to Adam Reach in Championship, 26/27 — drawn from 7 wing-backs with 450 or more minutes. A reference for the rates above, not a forecast.
| Player | Apps | Shots/90 | Fouls/90 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adam ReachLincoln City | 8 | 1.34 | 0.40 |
| Ryan AlebiosuBlackburn Rovers | 8 | 1.07 | 0.40 |
| Mark SykesMillwall | 7 | 1.09 | 0.36 |
| Neto BorgesMiddlesbrough | 8 | 0.73 | 0.55 |
| Jackson TchatchouaWolverhampton | 6 | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| Hugo BuenoWolverhampton | 6 | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| These 5, combined | 0.75 | 0.48 |
Recent matches
The last 10 games Adam Reach featured in — minutes and the counts that settle these markets.
| Match | Min | SoT | Shots | Fouls | Won | Tck | Cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swansea City19 Sep | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| @ Bristol City15 Sep | 71 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| @ Preston North End12 Sep | 88 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| Southampton5 Sep | 90 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Blackburn Rovers1 Sep | 90 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| @ Bolton Wanderers29 Aug | 90 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Portsmouth22 Aug | 90 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ Middlesbrough15 Aug | 89 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ Southampton17 May | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Southampton12 May | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Raw counts from every match on record, across 1 current Championship official — the model applies each official's overall card tendency, not this split. All Championship referees
Frequently asked
How often does Adam Reach have a shot on target?
In 26/27, Adam Reach has hit 1+ shot on target in 12% of 8 Championship appearances (1 of 8). That's the raw hit rate from completed matches; SharpXI's model turns it into a true probability by adjusting for the opponent and expected minutes, then compares it with the bookmaker's price as offered.
How many shots on target does Adam Reach average?
Across 8 Championship appearances in 26/27, Adam Reach is averaging 0.13 shots on target and 1.34 total shots per 90 minutes. SharpXI treats that as a starting rate, then adjusts for the opponent and expected minutes before pricing a 1+ or 2+ line.
How often does Adam Reach get booked?
Adam Reach is averaging 0.00 cards per 90 this season. Bookings swing heavily on the referee, so the model multiplies a player's base rate by each official's card tendency — the biggest single lever in the to-be-carded market.
Does Adam Reach commit or win more fouls?
This season Adam Reach commits 0.40 fouls per 90 and wins 0.94 — winning more than committing. Fouls committed and fouls won are separate markets, each modelled from the player's rate and the opponent faced.
Which player markets does SharpXI model for Adam Reach?
Shots on target, total shots, fouls committed, fouls won and to be carded — each as a true probability, compared with the bookmaker's price as offered. Adam Reach plays as a defender.
Rates shown are raw counts from public match data for context; the model adds shrinkage, opponent and referee factors before flagging value, and compares against the bookmaker's price as offered — player markets are priced one side only, so that price still carries the bookmaker's margin. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.